linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9062: Annotate struct da9062_regulators with __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 18:29:47 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>, 
 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9062: Annotate struct da9062_regulators
 with __counted_by

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:53:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
> 
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct da9062_regulators.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: da9062: Annotate struct da9062_regulators with __counted_by
      commit: 907f2a48359b836ff22e55eeb4a440fb9af86c10

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark