linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] kunit: Handle test faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:09:27 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, 
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, 
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, 
	"Madhavan T . Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>, Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>, 
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Thara Gopinath <tgopinath@...rosoft.com>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, 
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, Zahra Tarkhani <ztarkhani@...rosoft.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] kunit: Handle test faults

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:24:19AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:04:06PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > Previously, when a kernel test thread crashed (e.g. NULL pointer
> > dereference, general protection fault), the KUnit test hanged for 30
> > seconds and exited with a timeout error.
> > 
> > Fix this issue by waiting on task_struct->vfork_done instead of the
> > custom kunit_try_catch.try_completion, and track the execution state by
> > initially setting try_result with -EFAULT and only setting it to 0 if
> > the test passed.
> > 
> > Fix kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter() signature by returning 0
> > instead of calling kthread_complete_and_exit().  Because thread's exit
> > code is never checked, always set it to 0 to make it clear.
> > 
> > Fix the -EINTR error message, which couldn't be reached until now.
> > 
> > This is tested with a following patch.
> > 
> > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> 
> I assume we can start checking for "intentional" faults now?

Yes, but adding dedicated exception handling for such faults would
probably be cleaner.

At least we can now easily write tests as I did with the last patch. The
only potential issue is that the kernel will still print the related
warning in logs, but I think it's OK for tests (and maybe something we'd
like to test too by the way).

> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook
>