linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath9k: work around memset overflow warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:14:45 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Arnd
 Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>, Dmitry
 Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>, Hancheng Yang <hyang@...ebox.fr>, Remi
 Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath9k: work around memset overflow warning

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> writes:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> gcc-9 and some other older versions produce a false-positive warning
> for zeroing two fields
>
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:369,
>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:18:
> In function 'fortify_memset_chk',
>     inlined from 'ath9k_ps_wakeup' at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c:140:3:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:462:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
>   462 |                         __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Using a struct_group seems to reliably avoid the warning and
> not make the code much uglier. The combined memset() should even
> save a couple of cpu cycles.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>