linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18 Headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:57:39 -0700
From:	Jim Gifford <maillist@...55.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	dwmw2@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 Headers - Long

 When I wrote my script to sanitize, I was really surprised on which 
headers gets utilized and which ones didn't.. I have it down to the bare 
minimums in my script.

As far as glibc goes, from my people who are helping me the alpha 
architecture is the culprit there.

Do we have a list of what headers are "user-space" and which ones should 
not be "user-space"?

Also David W, let me know what I can do to help you out, a lot of people 
on my end want to get this working properly.

Who's maintaining util-linux these days, we probably should get a patch 
to them.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/