linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.17-1.2145_FC5 mmap-related soft lockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:19:42 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	"Gary Funck" <gary@...repid.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-1.2145_FC5 mmap-related soft lockup

On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:07:26 -0700
"Gary Funck" <gary@...repid.com> wrote:

> 
> A test program which allocates about 256M of MAP_ANONYMOUS mmap memory,
> and then spawns 4 processess, where each process i writes to 1/4 of the
> mapped memory, and then reads the memory written by
> the process (i + 1)%4, triggers a soft lockup, when exiting.
> Hardware:
> dual core dual Opteron 275 (Tyan motherboard, 4G physical memory)
> has been rock solid reliable.
> 
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
> 
> Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff802b2fb5>{softlockup_tick+219}
>        <ffffffff8029708e>{update_process_times+66}
> <ffffffff8027a3ed>{smp_local_timer_interrupt+35}
>        <ffffffff8027aa95>{smp_apic_timer_interrupt+65}
> <ffffffff80263acb>{apic_timer_interrupt+135} <EOI>
>        <ffffffff8020e578>{__set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0}
> <ffffffff8026a128>{_write_unlock_irq+11}
>        <ffffffff8020e62d>{__set_page_dirty_nobuffers+181}
> <ffffffff80207af6>{unmap_vmas+1037}
>        <ffffffff8023c7d9>{exit_mmap+120} <ffffffff8023eda8>{mmput+44}
>        <ffffffff80215ece>{do_exit+599}
> <ffffffff8024cacd>{debug_mutex_init+0}
>        <ffffffff80262f01>{tracesys+209}
> 
> ..
>
> The test program runs successfully, but hangs several seconds upon exit.
> 
> The hardware and software configuration has been solid for several months,
> but
> we have seen timer-related synchronization issues with recent kernels (where
> ntp has to force a re-sync for example, and an occasional lost ticks
> message).
> 
> The test program mentioned above is more complicated than described, and
> can't easily be reproduced in source form, but the binary could be
> made available.

ah-hah.  This sounds like the write_lock(tree_lock) starvation bug.

Are you able to confirm that setting CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=n fixes it?

And are you able to get us a copy of that test app?

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/