| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:52:16 +0200
From: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@...netzork.ping.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
Hi,
I have been running 2.6.17 on my desktop system (Asus A8V + Athlon64 X2 3800)
and I am having severe problems with lookups. These only show up when surfing
the net. During compiling or mprime runs --> absolutly no problem.
At first I thought this was related to the S-ATA driver since I got error
messages like these on the console once before it locked up hard (no sysrq!):
ata1: command 0xca timeout, stat 0x50 host_stat 0x4
ata1: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
ata1: command 0xea timeout, stat 0x50 host_stat 0x0
ata1: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
But switching to an IDE drive did not fix the lockups. So I switched to
2.6.18-rc2 and today I got the following reported via dmesg:
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0103cd2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0103de9>] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0143e77>] softlockup_tick+0xa7/0xd0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0129422>] run_local_timers+0x12/0x20
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c012923e>] update_process_times+0x6e/0xa0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c011127d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0103942>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c022df93>] cbc_process_decrypt+0x93/0xf0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c022dcbe>] crypt+0xee/0x1e0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c022ddef>] crypt_iv_unaligned+0x3f/0xc0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c022e23d>] cbc_decrypt_iv+0x3d/0x50
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c032f6b7>] crypt_convert_scatterlist+0x117/0x170
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c032f8b2>] crypt_convert+0x142/0x190
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c032fb82>] kcryptd_do_work+0x42/0x60
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c012fcff>] run_workqueue+0x6f/0xe0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c012fe98>] worker_thread+0x128/0x150
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c0133364>] kthread+0xa4/0xe0
Jul 17 09:23:03 [kernel] [<c01010e5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] =============================================
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] ---------------------------------------------
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] mv/12680 is trying to acquire lock:
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<c01f63b0>]
xfs_ilock+0x60/0xb0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] but task is already holding lock:
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<c01f63b0>]
xfs_ilock+0x60/0xb0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] other info that might help us debug this:
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] 4 locks held by mv/12680:
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] #0: (&s->s_vfs_rename_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03c2931>]
mutex_lock+0x21/0x30
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] #1: (&inode->i_mutex/1){--..}, at: [<c017506b>]
lock_rename+0xbb/0xd0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] #2: (&inode->i_mutex/2){--..}, at: [<c0175052>]
lock_rename+0xa2/0xd0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] #3: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at:
[<c01f63b0>] xfs_ilock+0x60/0xb0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] stack backtrace:
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0103cd2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0103de9>] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c01385a9>] print_deadlock_bug+0xb9/0xd0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c013862b>] check_deadlock+0x6b/0x80
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0139ed4>] __lock_acquire+0x354/0x990
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c013ac35>] lock_acquire+0x75/0xa0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0136aaf>] down_write+0x3f/0x60
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c01f63b0>] xfs_ilock+0x60/0xb0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0217981>] xfs_lock_inodes+0xb1/0x120
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c020ca7b>] xfs_rename+0x20b/0x8e0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c022351a>] xfs_vn_rename+0x3a/0x90
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c017687d>] vfs_rename_dir+0xbd/0xd0
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0176a4c>] vfs_rename+0xdc/0x230
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0176d02>] do_rename+0x162/0x190
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0176d9c>] sys_renameat+0x6c/0x80
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0176dd8>] sys_rename+0x28/0x30
Jul 17 09:24:17 [kernel] [<c0102e15>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
I am not sure if these infos are enough to isolate the problem. If you need any
further infos just let me know.
Best regards,
Jogi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists