linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:59:10 -0400
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To:	Shorty Porty <getshorty_@...mail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 23:53, Shorty Porty wrote:
> > > If this is the case, then wouldn't "long" be preferable to "int"?
> 
> Meh, it's all the same. I don't think 3 wasted CPU cycles is going to worry
> anyone too much. Hell, sometimes int IS long, though I might be wrong there.
> 

It is the _kernel_. In hot codepaths even 1 cycle matters.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/