lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:59:10 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com> To: Shorty Porty <getshorty_@...mail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean On Wednesday 19 July 2006 23:53, Shorty Porty wrote: > > > If this is the case, then wouldn't "long" be preferable to "int"? > > Meh, it's all the same. I don't think 3 wasted CPU cycles is going to worry > anyone too much. Hell, sometimes int IS long, though I might be wrong there. > It is the _kernel_. In hot codepaths even 1 cycle matters. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists