| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:58:21 -0400 From: "Christopher Montgomery" <xiphmont@...il.com> To: "Ian Stirling" <tandra@...ve.plus.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB bandwidth enforcement troubles. Nothing is simple in USB, although 1.1 is alot easier than 2.0 :-) The logs, unfortunately, don't tell much. But the short answer is probably 'don't use USB bandwidth enforcement'. If the bandwidth request it is reporting is accurate, the kernel is correctly rejecting the request. But, I suspect strongly either the kernel is miscalculating or the headset is vastly overreporting its needs. 991us in a FS frame would indeed be too much to schedule, but no headset would ever have cause to use that kind of bandwidth. Monty - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists