| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:57:00 +0300 From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > > Respect what? The process or the content? > > > > Rejecting content due to disrespect for process guidelines would be > > rather sad. > > No, it's not. That's what you have to do to keep the kernel maintainable. > > > If the content is worth its salt, it should be accepted w/o delay, then > > modified to comply with the process guidelines as necessary. It's what > > the GPL allows, afterall. > > Uhm, no. That's basically "throw it over the fence and let someone > else fix the crap." Fix it first, then it can go in. Sure, it would be terrible, if we started to accept "crap", but I wouldn't consider content that is worth its "salt", like reiserfs4, to be "crap". Rejection of content should be based on technical merits only, and no process guidelines should stay in the way of its preliminary acceptance. Otherwise, we would be asking for a return to a bureaucratic system that inhibits innovation, which I'm sure is not the intention of anybody, I hope. BTW, this does not mean that impoliteness should be rewarded, on the contrary, impoliteness has no place anywhere, and should just be ignored, even if the content is worth its salt. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists