linux-kernel - Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:32:51 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > This is the bit I missed, sorry. I thought that the s390 hardware
> > mandates 8 byte alignment, but it really doesn't. So you're absolutely
> > right, you don't need to set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and the alignment
> > calculation in slab is indeed broken for both, architecture and caller
> > mandated alignments.

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Well that is a bit far reaching. What is broken is that SLAB_RED_ZONE and
> SLAB_STORE_USER ignore any given alignment. If you want to fix that then 
> you need to modify how both debugging methods work.

Not sure I understand what you mean. Isn't it enough that we disable 
debugging if architecture or caller mandated alignment is greater than 
BYTES_PER_WORD?

				Pekka 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/