linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:47:16 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc:	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Yes and that's what we have been saying all along. When you want 
> performance, you use SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN and let the allocator do its job. 
> I don't see much point from API point of view for the caller to explicitly 
> ask for a given alignment and then in addition pass a 'yes I really meant' 
> flag (SLAB_DEBUG_OVERRIDE).

Btw, /proc/slabinfo for UML with defconfig reveals change for only one 
cache with my patch applied. The 'dquot' cache is created by dquot_init in 
fs/dquot.c and doesn't really seem to need the alignment for anything...

				Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/