| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:51:41 +0200 From: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de> Cc: nate.diller@...il.com, dlang@...italinsight.com, matthias.andree@....de, vonbrand@....utfsm.cl, ipso@...ppymail.ca, reiser@...esys.com, lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com Subject: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion] > suspect, particularly with 7200/min (s)ATA crap. Quoting myself (again): >> A quick'n'dirty ZFS-vs-UFS-vs-Reiser3-vs-Reiser4-vs-Ext3 'benchmark' Yeah, the test ran on a single SATA-Harddisk (quick'n'dirty). I'm so sorry but i don't have access to a $$$ Raid-System at home. Anyway: The test shows us that Reiser4 performed very good on my (common 0-8-15) hardware. > sdparm --clear=WCE /dev/sda # please. How about using /dev/emcpower* for the next benchmark? I mighty be able to re-run it in a few weeks if people are interested and if i receive constructive suggestions (= Postmark parameters, mkfs options, etc..) Regards, Adrian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists