linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:34:27 -0700
From:	Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	herbert@...hfloor.at, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy

Hi Dave,

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:21:46PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Please ignore that last one.  It didn't correctly handle directories'
> with a remaining i_nlink of 2.
Thanks for following up with this patch - it looks pretty good. One comment
below.


> @@ -888,7 +890,9 @@
>  	/* We can set nlink on the dinode now. clear the saved version
>  	 * so that it doesn't get set later. */
>  	fe->i_links_count = cpu_to_le16(inode->i_nlink);
> -	saved_nlink = 0;
> +	inode_drop_nlink(inode);
> +	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> +		inode_drop_nlink(inode);
The set of 'i_links_count' on 'fe' should be below the inode_drop_nlink()
calls - otherwise we'll be setting the old nlink value on the disk inode :)

While you're there you can just remove that comment - it's no longer
accurate :)

Thanks again,
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@...cle.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/