lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:54:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Problem: irq 217: nobody cared + backtrace

On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> On 03/08/06, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Has this happened more than once?
> 
> Seems to happen consistently after ~100000 interrupts.
> 
> >  In case it happens again, here's how
> > you can get more information.  Turn on CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, and mount a debugfs filesystem somewhere (say
> > /sys/kernel/debug).  Then after the problem occurs, save a copy of
> >
> >         /sys/kernel/debug/uhci/0000:00:1d.1
> >
> 
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/uhci/0000:00:1d.1
> Root-hub state: auto-stopped   FSBR: 0
> HC status
>   usbcmd    =     0048   Maxp32 CF EGSM
>   usbstat   =     0020   HCHalted
>   usbint    =     0002
>   usbfrnum  =   (1)160
>   flbaseadd = 37428160
>   sof       =       40
>   stat1     =     0080
>   stat2     =     0080
> Most recent frame: 458 (88)   Last ISO frame: 458 (88)
> 
> 
> > That will indicate whether the UHCI controller thinks it is sending an
> > interrupt request.

And it shows that the controller is idle.  No IRQ should be pending.

> And just for completenes, here's the backtrace I got just before
> saving the above info :
> 
> irq 217: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>  [<c0103a3c>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x152/0x165
>  [<c0103a5e>] show_trace+0xf/0x13
>  [<c0103b59>] dump_stack+0x15/0x19
>  [<c013846e>] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x7f
>  [<c0138552>] note_interrupt+0x6b/0xd5
>  [<c0137ca8>] __do_IRQ+0xf4/0x100
>  [<c01050a1>] do_IRQ+0x95/0xbc
>  [<c0103502>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
>  [<c0137b7e>] handle_IRQ_event+0x20/0x56
>  [<c0137c4c>] __do_IRQ+0x98/0x100
>  [<c01050a1>] do_IRQ+0x95/0xbc
>  [<c0103502>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
>  [<c0100e64>] mwait_idle+0x30/0x35
>  [<c0100d45>] cpu_idle+0x78/0x81
>  [<c04cc7fb>] start_kernel+0x173/0x19d
>  [<c0100210>] 0xc0100210
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xc0100210
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
>  =======================
> handlers:
> [<c02c5c22>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x53)
> Disabling IRQ #217

Just as before.

I can't tell you what's causing this to happen, except that it appears to 
be some sort of hardware problem.  Since it doesn't seem to cause any harm 
you could just live with it.

Or, if you're not using any full-speed or low-speed USB devices, you could 
simply prevent uhci-hcd from loading at all.  Then IRQ 217 wouldn't get 
enabled in the first place.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ