lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:42:23 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Keith Owens <kaos@....com.au> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Mismatch between hdaprm and sdparm output On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:32 +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > NEC Versa S5200 laptop with FUJITSU MHV2080B SATA disk. Kernel > 2.6.16.21-0.13-smp (suselinux 10.1) using ata_piix. hdparm and sdparm > give inconsistent results, which one should I believe? My main concern > is write caching (XFS filesystem). well write caching you should be able to benchmark easily.. does, say, dbench or tiobench show any difference ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists