linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 08:16:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
To:	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops

On Monday 07 August 2006 08:03, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 22:43 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> +/* Stop speculative execution */
> > >> +static inline void sync_core(void)
> > >> +{
> > >> +	unsigned int eax = 1, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > >> +	__cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > >> +}
> > >>     
> > >
> > > Actually I don't think this one should be para virtualized at all.
> > > I don't see any reason at all why a hypervisor should trap it and it
> > > is very time critical. I would recommend you move it back into the 
> > > normal files without hooks.
> 
> I don't see where it's time-critical...

See explanation in my other email. Also in general we want this one fast.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/