| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:00:21 -0500 From: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@...u.edu> To: Nathan Scott <nathans@....com> Cc: Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16 Nathan Scott wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? >> There have been some bugs: >> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380 >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757 >> > > These are the same problem. 2.6.16 is unaffected. > > >> want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs. >> > > For XFS, its goodness. 2.6.18 will be good too, and 2.6.17.7+. > > cheers. > > If you have run 2.6.17 to 2.6.17.6 or early 2.6.18-rc? however; please run a xfs_repair v.2.6.10; because the corruption may/will have already taken place and a silent time bomb may be waiting. Three machines already died with symptom of the corruption on kernels that no longer have the problem. -- Jeffrey Hundstad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists