[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:26:57 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 14:22 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> sys_getppid() optimization can access a freed memory.
> On kernels with DEBUG_SLAB turned ON, this results in
> Oops.
...
> +#else
> + /*
> + * ->real_parent could be released before dereference and
> + * we accessed freed kernel memory, which faults with debugging on.
> + * Keep it simple and stupid.
> + */
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + pid = current->group_leader->real_parent->tgid;
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +#endif
> return pid;
> }
Accessing freed memory is a bug, always, not just *only* when slab
debugging is on, right? Doesn't this mean we could get junk, or that
the reader could potentially run off a bad pointer?
It seems that this patch only papers over the problem in the case when
it is observed, but doesn't really even fix the normal case.
Could we use a seqlock to determine when real_parent is in flux, and
re-read real_parent until we get a consistent one? We could use in in
lieu of the existing for() loop.
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists