[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:25:16 -0400
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matti.aarnio@...iler.org
Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Maw, 2006-08-08 am 13:23 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> > > You would make bug reports impossible from normal people who
> > > don't want to subscribe fully. It would totally wreck the
> > > development model.
> >
> > Only if applied without imagination.
> >
> > Tag subject lines from non subscribes with [nonsub] and everyone can
> > then decide for themselves.
>
> This looks like a very clever yet simple idea (if easy to implement at all) !
> While I have no anti-spam and am not annoyed at all by the low spam rate on
> LKML, I think this would make my cleaning operations even more effective.
That would mean 8 fewer characters of useful information visible in the
subject line.
The spam ratio on LKML is so low that I think this cure would be worse
than the disease. Why can't the minority of LKML readers who have
absolutely zero tolerance for spam just filter locally?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists