linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:18:16 +0200
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> 2006-08-09 16:07
> I think Daniel was thinking of adding struct net_device *
> sk_buff::alloc_dev,
> I know I was after reading the first few mails. However if adding a
> field 
> there is strict no-no....
> 
> /me takes a look at struct sk_buff
> 
> Hmm, what does sk_buff::input_dev do? That seems to store the initial
> device?

No, skb->input_dev is used when redirecting packets around in the
stack and may change. Even if it would keep its value the reference
to the netdevice is not valid anymore when you free the skb as the
skb was queued and the refcnt acquired in __netifx_rx_schedule()
has been released again thus making it possible for the netdevice
to disappear.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/