linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:07:00 +0400
From:	Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT

Willy,

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:16:37AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Most people compiling 2.4 for
> servers right now most probably do not enable support for a.out already.

I'm afraid that most don't change the default, not being aware that this
is an unreasonable security risk.

>   - you split the defconfig changes from the rest and let them in a
>     state compatible with 2.4.33 features, which even implies setting
>     CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT to 'y', even if this sounds gross to you.
>   - I merge the changes to support the new option

I can do that, but:

- it almost defeats the purpose of the patch since most people won't
know to change the defaults;
- Marcelo is of the opinion that it's "not 2.4 material at this point in
time".

Given the above, do you still want me to resubmit a reworked patch like
that?

>   - you just have to maintain the patch for the defconfig files in owl.

I submit these patches in hope that they will be useful for mainstream
kernels, not in an attempt to simplify maintenance of -ow patches.

Thanks,

Alexander
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/