| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:53:47 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org> To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com> Cc: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/20] 2.6.17-stable review >>>>> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com> writes: Kyle> On Aug 22, 2006, at 09:49:29, John Stoffel wrote: >> "Greg" == Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> writes: >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:46:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: >>>> Any chance of a 2.6.17.10-rc1 rollup patch again, like you did >>>> for .8? >> >>> Oops, forgot to do that, thanks for reminding me. It can be found >>> at: >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/stable/ >>> patch-2.6.17.10-rc1.gz >> >>> And yes, it's not in the "main" v2.6 subdirectories, I'm not going >>> to put it there anymore as it confuses too many scripts/people. >> >> So what if they're confused? If they're official releases, blessed >> with holy penguin pee, then shouldn't they be in the standard >> release area? Kyle> Well, except for the fact that the pre-stable RC patches are Kyle> neither "official" nor "releases". They're just a combo rollup Kyle> patch of all of the proposed stable patches before they've been Kyle> batch reviewed on the LKML. (IOW: just for ease of testing) Doh. Never mind, excuse the egg on my face please... John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists