lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:54:52 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:41 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>>> The reason for adding this infrastructure is that power management in
>>> the idle loop needs to make a tradeoff between latency and power
>>> savings (deeper power save modes have a longer latency to running code
>>> again).
>>
>>
>> What if a processor was already in a sleep state when a call to 
>> set_acceptable_latency() latency occurs? 
> 
> 
> there's nothing sane that can be done in that case; any wake up already 
> will cause the unwanted latency!
> A premature wakeup is only making it happen *now*, but now is as 
> inconvenient a time as any...
> (in fact it may be a worst case time scenario, say, an audio interrupt...)

Surely you would call set_acceptable_latency() *before* running such
operation that requires the given latency? And that set_acceptable_latency
would block the caller until all CPUs are set to wake within this latency.

That would be the API semantics I would expect, anyway.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ