linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:30:06 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

On Friday 01 September 2006 10:26, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I applied it now, with one change. I replaced the %Ps with %cs because
> > that is apparently the more official way to do that in gcc. Please
> > change that in your copy too.
> >   
> 
> Do you mean the %P0, etc in the asms?

Yes.

> > There unfortunately were still quite a lot of rejects because -mm* 
> > is too different from mainline, but I fixed them all.
> >   
> Thanks.  Were there more conflicts than entry.S?

Yes ptrace-abi.h doesn't exist and the ""s in the Subject of your last patch caused 
quilt to freak out. I think there was one other too.

I hope everything still works. At least one of my test machines 
is currently completely unhappy on i386 with random hangs (even before 
your patches), still bisecting it.

-Andi
     
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/