linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/22][RFC] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:23:10 -0400
From:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, akpm@...l.org, viro@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22][RFC] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:53:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:35:13 -0400 Josef Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu> wrote:
> >
> > This set of patches constitutes Unionfs version 2.0. We are presenting it to
> > be reviewed and considered for inclusion into the kernel.
> 
> Small nit: is it possible to order these patches so that the kernel
> builds at each intermediate point (so we can use git bisect).  The
> easiest way to achieve this would be to do the Kconfig and Makefile
> updates last.

Ideally, when Unionfs is commited into git, the whole thing would be one
commit - what's the point of having half of a filesystem? I reordered the
patches for the next submission so that the Makefile & kconfig one is last.

Thanks,

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/