linux-kernel - Re: lockdep oddity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:52:20 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
Cc:	'Heiko Carstens' <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Arjan van de Ven' <arjan@...radead.org>,
	'Daniel Walker' <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: lockdep oddity


* Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com> wrote:

> Maybe we should define raw __likely/__unlikely which behave the same 
> way as the vanilla and use them in places like spinlocks to avoid 
> these weird problems.

yes - but only once the true reason for the oddity is debugged.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/