linux-kernel - Re: lockdep oddity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:18:27 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: lockdep oddity

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:07:47PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:03 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Found this will debugging some random memory corruptions that happen when
> > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY are both on.
> > Switching both off or having only one of them on seems to work.
> 
> There's potential for a some issues in current -mm , given the config
> above. If you us the generic atomic operations
> (asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h) for test_and_set_bit(). It eventually
> calls into trace_hardirqs_off() and then back into likely profiling. 
> 
> What architecture are you running this on?

This was s390. We have our own bitops and trace_hardirqs_off() won't
be called for test_and_set_bit(). Must be something different.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/