[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:39:00 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 - x86_64-mm-lockdep-dont-force-framepointer.patch
On Friday 08 September 2006 14:23, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> x86_64-mm-lockdep-dont-force-framepointer.patch does this:
> > Don't force frame pointers for lockdep
> >
> > Now that stacktrace supports dwarf2 don't force frame pointers for
> > lockdep anymore
> >
> > Cc: mingo@...e.hu
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> >
> > ---
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
> > 1 files changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ linux/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -218,7 +218,6 @@ config LOCKDEP
> > bool
> > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT &&
> > STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT select STACKTRACE
> > - select FRAME_POINTER
>
> This patch affects all architecture. I'd like to keep the "select
> FRAME_POINTER" for s390, since we don't support dwarf2.
Perhaps you should port the unwinder then? I know you use it
in userland.
> So this patch should be dropped.
I changed it now to add a if !X86 so it should be ok now
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists