lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:11:56 +0200
From:	"Thomas Maier" <balagi@...tmail.de>
To:	"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, "Phillip Susi" <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"petero2@...ia.com" <petero2@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktcdvd: added sysfs interface + bio write queue handling fix

Hello,

>> +    write_queue_size  (r)  Contains the size of the bio write
>> +                           queue.
...
>> +    mapped_to              Symbolic link to mapped block device
>> +                           in the /sys/block tree.
>
> Shouldn't this whole thing be in /sys/class/ instead of /sys/block/ ?

Don't know. I thought, the pktcdvd is a block driver, so put
the control files into /sys/block ..
Is /sys/class better? If yes, where to put it?

> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:40:11PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>> >On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Thomas Maier wrote:
>> >>+/sys/block/pktcdvd/<pktdevname>/packet/
>> >>+    statistic         (r)  Show device statistic. One line with
>> >>+                           5 values in following order:
>> >>+                              packets-started
>> >>+                              packets-end
>> >>+                              written in kB
>> >>+                              read gather in kB
>> >>+                              read in kB
>> >
>> >Please no.  One value per file is the sysfs rule.
>> >
>>
>> Except in cases like this where you want to read the status of the
>> device at a given point in time, and you can't do that unless you grab
>> all the values at once.
>
> Then don't use sysfs for that.  And is something like this as critical
> to get that kind of information all in one atomic chunk?  It seems
> merely to be informational.

The "statistic" and "info" files are only for information purpose.
Into /proc ? No. (i read somewhere /proc should only contain process
information in future)
In debugfs? Hmm, this files should be infos that users should be able
to read, no debug output.

Is it ok, if i split the "statistic" into 5 files, and put the "info"
into debugfs ?

-Thomas Maier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ