lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:41 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2 Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse: > But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be > built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm > only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going > to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and > sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made. glibc needs them, nobody else does. The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already, and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists