lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:51:11 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	"Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@...il.com>
Cc:	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Timer Selection

On Sunday 10 September 2006 12:34, Dong Feng wrote:
> In i386 architecture, there are five timers as candidates in the selection
> of "cur_timer." I feel among the five only two types can be used as Kernel
> base timer, HPET and PIT. Kernel base timer is the timer trigger
> timer_interrupt() periodically. Namely, the timer installed on IRQ 0 in
> i386 architecture.
>
> Is the above understanding correct? Particularly I want to confirm which
> timers can be used as Kernel base timer.

Only HPET and PIT can be interrupt 0 in the PC architecture
(HPET only if the legacy option is available), but there is no reason 
the main timer handler cannot be driven from another interval timer (e.g. 
x86-64 offers the APIC timer as a option for this)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ