linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:59:43 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...l.ru>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:24:25PM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:02:06AM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> >   
> >> Sure. At the beginning I have one task with one BC. Then
> >> 1. A thread is spawned and new BC is created;
> >>     
> >
> > Why do we have to create a BC for every new thread? A new BC is needed
> > for every new service level instead IMO. And typically there wont be
> > unlimited service levels.
> >   
> That's the scenario we started from - each domain is served in a separate
> BC with *threaded* Apache.

Sure ..but you can still meet that requirement by creating fixed set of
BCs (for each domain) and let each new thread be associated with a
corresponding BC (w/o requiring to create BC for every new thread),
depending on which domain's request it is serving?

> >   
> >> 2. New thread touches a new page (e.g. maps a new file) which is charged
> >> to new BC
> >>     (and this means that this BC's must stay in memory till page is
> >> uncharged);
> >> 3. Thread exits after serving the request, but since it's mm is shared
> >> with parent
> >>     all the touched pages stay resident and, thus, the new BC is still
> >> pinned in memory.
> >> Steps 1-3 are done multiple times for new pages (new files).
> >> Remember that we're discussing the case when pages are not recharged.
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/