linux-kernel - [PATCH 00/20] vm deadlock avoidance for NFS, NBD and iSCSI (take 7)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:25:49 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 00/20] vm deadlock avoidance for NFS, NBD and iSCSI (take 7)

--

Yet another instance of my networked swap patches.

The patch-set consists of four parts:

 - patches 1-2; the basic 'framework' for deadlock avoidance
 - patches 3-9; implement swap over NFS
 - patches 10-13; implement swap over NBD
 - patches 14-20; implement swap over iSCSI

The iSCSI work depends on their .19 tree and does need some more work,
but does work in its current state.

As stated in previous posts, NFS and iSCSI survive service failures and
reconnect properly during heavy swapping.

Linus, when I mentioned swap over network to you in Ottawa, you said it was
a valid use case, that people actually do and want this. Can you agree with
the approach taken in these patches?

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/