lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:48:45 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> CC: akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: i386 PDA patches use of %gs Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Jeremy, is there a reason you're specifically using %gs and not %fs? If > not, would you mind a switch to using %fs instead? > The main reason for using %gs was to take advantage of gcc's TLS support. I intend to measure the cost of gs vs fs, and if there's a significant difference I'll switch. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists