linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:04:14 -0700
From:	Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Preece Scott-PREECE <scott.preece@...orola.com>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:24PM +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Pavel,
> 
> On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable
> >and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as
> >you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big
> >changes under the hood).
> 
> who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?!
>

Mostly Pavel is.

There are questions on how to set/get operating points between the
platform and user space, and some questions on one to make the space of
operating points extensible outside of compile time deployment nice.
But these questions aren't the ones I see folks fussing about.

--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/