linux-kernel - Re: TCP stack behaviour question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:47:10 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@....net>
Cc:	"Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@...necttech.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP stack behaviour question

On Tuesday 19 September 2006 08:13, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Von: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@...necttech.com>
> 
> > > > Ok maybe it's a bit misleading. Michael, you might want to clarify.
> > > 
> > > Can some one of you propose a better text please?
> > 
> > Perhaps
> > 
> > Note that TCP has no error queue; MSG_ERRQUEUE is illegal on
> > SOCK_STREAM sockets.  IP_RECVERR is valid for TCP, but all errors are
> > returned by socket function return or SO_ERROR only.
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Sound okay to you Andi?

Yes.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/