lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:33:24 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet
 patch

The inode diet patch in -mm unhooked xfs_preferred_iosize from the stat call:

--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ vn_revalidate_core(
        inode->i_blocks     = vap->va_nblocks;
        inode->i_mtime      = vap->va_mtime;
        inode->i_ctime      = vap->va_ctime;
-       inode->i_blksize    = vap->va_blocksize;
        if (vap->va_xflags & XFS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE)

This in turn breaks the largeio mount option for xfs:

  largeio/nolargeio
        If "nolargeio" is specified, the optimal I/O reported in
        st_blksize by stat(2) will be as small as possible to allow user
        applications to avoid inefficient read/modify/write I/O.
        If "largeio" specified, a filesystem that has a "swidth" specified
        will return the "swidth" value (in bytes) in st_blksize. If the
        filesystem does not have a "swidth" specified but does specify
        an "allocsize" then "allocsize" (in bytes) will be returned
        instead.
        If neither of these two options are specified, then filesystem
        will behave as if "nolargeio" was specified.

and the (undocumented?) allocsize mount option as well.

For a filesystem like this with sunit/swidth specified,

meta-data=/dev/sda1              isize=512    agcount=32, agsize=7625840 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=244026880, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=16     swidth=16 blks, unwritten=1
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=1
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks
realtime =none                   extsz=65536  blocks=0, rtextents=0

stat on a stock FC6 kernel w/ the largeio mount option returns only the page size:

[root@...k-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@...k-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
4096

with the following patch, it does what it should:

[root@...k-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@...k-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
65536

same goes for filesystems w/o sunit,swidth but with the allocsize mount option.

stock:
[root@...k-07]# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@...k-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
4096

w/ patch:
[root@...k-07# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@...k-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
32768

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>

XFS guys, does this look ok?

Index: linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
+++ linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
@@ -623,12 +623,16 @@ xfs_vn_getattr(
 {
 	struct inode	*inode = dentry->d_inode;
 	bhv_vnode_t	*vp = vn_from_inode(inode);
+	xfs_inode_t	*ip;
 	int		error = 0;
 
 	if (unlikely(vp->v_flag & VMODIFIED))
 		error = vn_revalidate(vp);
-	if (!error)
+	if (!error) {
 		generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
+		ip = xfs_vtoi(vp);
+		stat->blksize = xfs_preferred_iosize(ip->i_mount);
+	}
 	return -error;
 }
 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ