linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2] acpi_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:06:03 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2]
 acpi_map_cpu2node

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:06:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > I rewrote the whoe patch..
> > 
> 
> Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup
> take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes.
> 
Sorry....I noticed cpu-to-node relation ship should be fixed before onlining.
About subject, I should be more carefull.

> What I have now is:
> 
> cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch
> cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch
> 
> I shall send those patches in reply to this email.  Please confirm that
> these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc.
> 
will do.

> Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x?
> 
yes, I do, becasue my system panics now at cpu onlining.

Thank you.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/