linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	akpm@...l.org
Cc:	auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, Holger.Kiehl@....de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-net@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:50:00 -0700

> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:10:36 -0700
> Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > e1000: account for NET_IP_ALIGN when calculating bufsiz
> > 
> > Account for NET_IP_ALIGN when requesting buffer sizes from netdev_alloc_skb to 
> > reduce slab allocation by half.
> 
> Could we please do whatever is needed to get this blessed and merged?  This
> is such a common problem on such a common driver that I would suggest that
> we want this in 2.6.18.x as well.  At least, I'd expect distributors to
> ship this fix (they're nuts if they don't) and so it makes sense to deliver
> it from kernel.org.

The NET_IP_ALIGN existed not just for fun :)  There are ramifications
for removing it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/