linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:08 -0400
From:	Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeff@...zik.org,
	davidsen@....com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:09:48 +0100
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> Before people disagree with my statement (and I'm referring to all the
> replies so far), maybe they should talk to Thomas who pioneered the
> genirq changes to find out why he decided to work with patches rather
> than a git repository?

When Thomas makes a sweeping statement about the applicability of one
tool over another people will respond to him.  But if _you_ make such
a statement yourself (even if it's based on his conclusions) then
you better accept that people who disagree will respond to your statement.

Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/