linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:31:44 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction

On 26 Sep 2006 11:06:24 +0200
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com> wrote:

> Patch 2 & 3 look correct, but they would need to be tested.

Ok, I've tested part 2 (at91_serial: Fix roundoff error in
at91_console_get_options), and it works on my AT91RM9200-EK board. In
fact, the latest git code does _not_ work -- I see the same garbage as
on ATSTK1000, and this patch fixes it.

Part 3 probably has real problems, and I'm not sure how to fix it. I'll
try some kind of "break timeout" so that any problems will at least be
transient. The current break code works on neither STK1000 nor
AT91RM9200-EK, so even a not-quite-100%-correct fix should be
acceptable, no?

I'm queuing up some patches now that I'll send off as soon as I get them
tested on both ARM and AVR32. This includes the big rename patch I've
been talking about.

Håvard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/