linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] UML - Assign random MACs to interfaces if necessary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:33:43 -0400
From:	Jason Lunz <lunz@...ooley.org>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] UML - Assign random MACs to interfaces if necessary

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:57:47PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Now, if there is no MAC from the command line, one is generated.  We
> use the microseconds from gettimeofday (20 bits), plus the low 12
> bits of the pid to seed the random number generator.  random() is
> called twice, with 16 bits of each result used.  I didn't want to
> have to try to fill in 32 bits optimally given an arbitrary
> RAND_MAX, so I just assume that it is greater than 65536 and use 16
> bits of each random() return.

Why not use random_ether_addr() like dummy, tun, ifb and others?

Jason
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/