linux-kernel - Re: Stupid kexec/kdump question...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:10:29 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Stupid kexec/kdump question...

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:25:06 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> OK, I'm running a Fedora Core 6 (rawhide actually) box with -18-mm1 kernel.
> I've installed kexec-tools and similar, and am trying to get the kernels
> built following the hints in Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt, but a few
> questions arise:
> 
> 1) Other than the fact that the Fedora userspace looks for a ${kernelvers}kdump
> kernel, is there any reason the kdump kernel has to match the running one, or
> can an older kernel be used?
> 
> 2) I'm presuming that a massively stripped down kernel (no sound support,
> no netfilter, no etc) that just has what's needed to mount the dump location
> is sufficient?
> 
> 3) The docs recommend 'crashkernel=64M@...', but that's 8% of my memory.
> What will happen if I try '16M@...' instead?  Just slower copying due to
> a smaller buffer cache space, or something more evil?
> 

(cc added)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/