linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.18 perfmon new code base + libpfm + pfmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:09:51 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	eranian@....hp.com
Cc:	perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com, perfctr-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 perfmon new code base + libpfm + pfmon

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:34:20 -0700
Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> wrote:

> I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> This version of the kernel patch is relative to 2.6.18. This longer
> than usual delay between releases comes from the large amount of changes
> than went into this new release following the feedback I got on LKML. As
> a result, the code has improved.

Thanks for doing that.

Would it be possible to get an accounting of the disposition of the various
review comments?  Of the "yes I did that" or "OK, but I'll do it later" or
"no, you're an idiot" form?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/