linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:35:07 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:58:30 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:

> The following patch (DO NOT APPLY) illustrates why
> device_for_each_child() should not be marked with __must_check.
> 
> The function returns the return value of the actor function, and ceases
> iteration upon error.
> 
> However, _every_ case in drivers/scsi has a hardcoded return value,
> illustrating how it is quite valid to not check the return value of this
> function.
> 

What does "has a hardcoded return value" mean?

AFICT the problem here is that (for example) (going up the call stack in
the callee->caller direction):

scsi_internal_device_block() returns an error code

but device_block() drops that on the floor

so target_block() drops it on the floor too

so scsi_target_block() drops it on the floor too

It's a small matter of (correct kernel) programming to correctly propagate
the scsi_internal_device_block() error code all the way back out of
scsi_target_block().

It all looks rather sloppy?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/