[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830609290922v3c1c0798wcf4ff16f0883884d@mail.google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:22:23 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>
Cc: "Matt Helsley" <matthltc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jes@....com, lse-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, sekharan@...ibm.com,
jtk@...ibm.com, hch@....de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
sgrubb@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
On 9/28/06, Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> How might this play with Paul Menage's <menage@...gle.com> patch posted
> earlier today on lkml:
>
> [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system
I've not looked closely at Matt's patch, but I'm sure that there would
be no problems with hooking the container system to use task watchers
rather than patching fork.c/exit.c directly.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists