linux-kernel - Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:25:50 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository

On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:20 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
> > > > 
> > > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
> > > 
> > > I bow to your incredible power of observation.  Now that you've shared
> > > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing
> > > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one?
> > 
> > Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm
> > not.
> 
> And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not
> that?

You mean the patch from Steven posted in May? Well it does appear to
silence the warning. You didn't like the approach it seems? Please tell
me why .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/