linux-kernel - Re: x86 BUG bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:56:47 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: x86 BUG bug


> 
> Being rusty on the gcc asm syntax -- does an inline asm statement permit 
> 'noreturn'? -- I figured it would be best just to report this, rather 
> than create a patch myself.

It doesn't AFAIK. It might be possible with an inline function
though with a wrapper macro for __FUNCTION__

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/