| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:35:27 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com> Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>, Drew Scott Daniels <ddaniels@...lumni.mb.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs? On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:12:55PM -0700, David Lang wrote: > no, I was suggesting a pack file that contained _only_ the head version. > > within the pack file it would delta against other files in the pack (how > many copies of the GPLv2 text exist across all files for example) > > however Willy did a test and found that the resulting pack was > significantly larger then a .tgz. I don't know what options he used, so > while there's some chance that being more agressive in looking for deltas > would result in an improvement, the difference to make up is fairly > significant. no options at all, so there may be room for improvement. Also, on my notebook, I have hardlinked all my linux directories so that each content only appears once. I don't have the numbers right here, but I remember that it was really useful to merge lots of different versions, but that the net gain within one given tree was really minor, as there are not that many identical files in one tree. Regards, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists