linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:56:48 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, "David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
	"Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than
 passing to IRQ handlers

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:43:38 -0400
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

> >
> > I think the change is good.  But I don't want to maintain this whopper
> > out-of-tree for two months!  If we want to do this, we should just smash it
> > in and grit our teeth.
> 
> Yes, lets drop it in while we still not reached rc1.

Doing it after -rc1 would be saner, when the tree isn't changing at a
megabyte-per-minute.  Give people at least a couple of days to review it,
test it, etc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/